Sunday, 16 October 2016
Monday, 19 September 2016
Using computers is built on metaphors, they drive everything. You are presented with a virtual desktop, because that makes it easy for you to understand. You are presented with a folder hierarchy, even although the data is spread about all over the place. The computer interface encourages you, indeed compels you to make false assumptions to conceptualise what is going on.
It strikes me that some of our current understanding of how computers work is being stretched, and perhaps a new understanding is required.
A few examples.
when is an application not an application - well often applications seem to sit as a gatekeeper for information or data. So Word is one thing, but the Word documents are another. Or Evernote, Dropbox, or iCloud are they an application, they offer access to documents. But then Dropbox has no real menu bar as such on your computer, nor does iCloud, there is some functionality accessible on your desktop, and other functionality via the internet in the Cloud. But where is the application, or is it an application at all. Although the software wants to be trouble free, so you don’t have to think about it, what does happen when you lose your wifi connection, what is actually left on your computer, what is out of reach in the Cloud.
when are you logged out - the traditional model is that you log in, like putting a key in a door, and then you can Quit, or log out, or even switch off the computer, and you are logged out. However now that passwords are buried in Keychain and the like, you never actually enter those log in details. So to all intents and purposes you are perpetually logged in. I got an email from Dropbox suggesting that I update my password, which I did. But it just seems to leave all my existing accounts open and running. Are they running with the updated password, or an old one, I have no idea and no idea how to find out.
the easiest way to breach your IT security - it was assumed that malicious hackers would be seeking to log into your accounts online, and lay your whole life open. If you were determined to hack someone now the easiest way to do it would be to steal or clone a device, and with people’s devices all syncing to each other all the time, you could just sit there and all their data would appear before you. With a stolen laptop or phone, it would be far easier to get past a few passwords than trawling through different usernames and passwords for various online services.
with digital you only ever rent - increasingly software is moving to a subscription model. But even where you own something digital, in reality you are only ever renting it. The succession of formats we have seen for music, vinyl, cassette, cd, digital, is not going to stop. Similarly for movies, software, fonts, or anything else with digital content. It seems unlikely that any format would stay accessible for twenty years plus, so we all just need to resign ourselves to buying everything we own, again and again and again. Modern technology wants to be invisible, remove any obvious distinction between what is on your device and what is in the cloud, but when the wifi signal falters we might just find ourselves with dumb terminals that know nothing.
Saturday, 27 August 2016
Inspiring Impressionism | Daubigny | Monet | Van Gogh
25th June − 2nd October 2016
Scottish National Gallery | £11 (£9)
It is not often you discover an artist that you had never heard of, but is actually really really good.
Yesterday I had planned to listen to Darran Anderson discuss High Rise (by JG Ballard) at the Edinburgh Book Festival. Unfortunately when I checked Twitter he was stuck at Charles De Gaulle airport and was going to miss his sold out event. I was already taking a half day off work, so I found myself with a morning to fill in Edinburgh. I swung by the Royal Scottish Academy (the big neoclassical art gallery on the Mound that is nearest to Princes Street). There was an exhibition on Daubigny and the Impressionists, so I went to see that.
Like most people I am familiar with the Impressionists, and have various books of their works. Although the paintings reproduce well, and the movement was an overdue shot in the arm for moribund landscape painting, seeing the paintings in person is often an underwhelming experience. The works can come across as flat and decorative. Daubigny I had never heard of, and I presumed it was an opportunity to hang some familiar impressionist paintings from local galleries along with some musty predecessor
As it turned out Daubigny was an absolute revelation. He is one of those rare artists where is it hard to consistently identify the works as all being by the same artist. He had a sense of humour, sketching his life in a boat that he used as a floating studio, he could do the detailed landscapes in dark tones that are familiar in countless galleries, but also blast out painted sketches that captured some momentary light effect with the setting sun or suchlike. He loved to experiment with paint, getting effects that are quite remarkable.
He was capable of capturing the light, detail and mood of a scene. Often I would slip off my glasses and the blurred image before me could pass for the reality of a day in France long ago, but there still before me. To my taste generally his works showed the weaknesses of the neighbouring impressionist works, though there were a few where it seemed that Daubigny had raised their game too.
With Daubigny the reproductions do not do him justice, there is no substitute for the real things, a highly recommended exhibition, offering an opportunity to see the range and power of a major artist and the influence he had on art history.
I do rather wonder whether it was Daubigny who was the model for the painter Elstir in Proust, although Wikipedia suggest Monet as the model.
Friday, 29 July 2016
I normally post reviews to Amazon, but this book is published by Phaidon, exclusively available from them, and therefore not currently available to review of Amazon.
Architizer 2016 - review
Sunday, 10 July 2016
2 July 2016
14:30 assemble outside John Knox House, £8.00 book online
This particular tour was one of the various offerings provided by the Architecture Fringe 2016, running during July 2016. Having said that Jean Bareham who gives the tours runs them fairly regularly so it should not be too difficult to find an alternative offering. Jean also offers other like themed tours and has written a short books of the Hidden Gardens of the Royal Mile. Relevant links attached below.
If you are looking for epic formal gardens then this is not the tour for you, however if you are keen to get behind the facades of the Royal Mile, as the buildings tumble their way down the slope from Edinburgh Castle to Holyrood Palace then this is wonderful. There are a couple of gardens that are quite professional and amazing, while others are not much more than areas where a few paving slabs have been lifted and some welcome greenery squeezed in.
The combination of the Old Town alleys and courts with little pockets of green is really rather wonderful. Likewise Jean could not be bettered as a guide, she seemed to know everything and everyone.
There was plenty of talk about Patrick Geddes and a separate tour is available devoted to him. Understanding Geddes is impossible without seeing and walking the Old Town that inspired him.
There is something noble about gardening, quietly and unostentatiously creating something of beauty for others to enjoy. On the one hand it is sad to realise just how fragile these dear green places are, but encouraging to see how much of an impact a handful of gardeners can still make to positively enhance one of the world’s most beautiful cities.
Tuesday 21 June - Sunday 17 July
daily 10am to 10pm
Mound Square, the Mound, Edinburgh
Five cities from around the globe, have each contributed a pavilion for this pop up expo on the Mound in Edinburgh. The Ideal Hut Exhibition was here earlier in the year, and it strikes me that some more permanent means of enclosing the area might be useful if there is going to be a regular series of these events.
Each pavilion was a very fancy hut. It was the Dutch one that most caught my imagination, made of pipes it was appropriate to the site, fun and great to look at. The others will doubtless all have their own admirers, and it was nice to see something relevant, edgy and different here in Edinburgh. The exhibition was attracting a diverse and interested audience when I was there, suggesting that there is a ready audience for more pop ups.